<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>SnapJag Creative Designs &#187; Picasa</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.snapjag.com/tag/picasa/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.snapjag.com</link>
	<description>Specialists in busines consulting, database administration, programming, hosting, photography, and creative system designs.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2011 00:59:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Mac vs Picasa</title>
		<link>http://www.snapjag.com/2008/09/mac-vs-picasa/</link>
		<comments>http://www.snapjag.com/2008/09/mac-vs-picasa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:14:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>snapjag</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Computers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Picasa]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://snapjag.wordpress.com/?p=23</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I didn&#8217;t get to respond to the blog at this other site because the Blog Administrator has blocked new posts. So I&#8217;m taking things into my own hands to speak my peace. For the record, it&#8217;s not really Mac vs Picasa. It&#8217;s that Picasa doesn&#8217;t yet work (natively) on the Mac, the keyword being YET. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t get to respond to the blog at this <a title="Picasa for the Mac" href="http://googlesystem.blogspot.com/2008/01/google-to-launch-picasa-for-mac.html" target="_blank">other site</a> because the Blog Administrator has blocked new posts. So I&#8217;m taking things into my own hands to speak my peace. For the record, it&#8217;s not really Mac vs Picasa. It&#8217;s that Picasa doesn&#8217;t yet work (natively) on the Mac, the keyword being YET.<span id="more-290"></span></p>
<p>I wish it did. But I have a solution &#8230; so read on. I understand beforehand that the original topic surrounds  free software, and I have no qualms about free stuff, but I wanted to give a best answer, and it required leaving the realm of free software. I encourage free software, use it, and am extremely grateful to those that produce it. I write reviews like this to help benefit them.</p>
<p>First and foremost. A few products and environments that I like: I love Google &#8220;stuff&#8221;. They make my life much easier. I love Mac too because it doesn&#8217;t crash and it&#8217;s user friendly, it&#8217;s useful for my family and helps me with my artsy stuff. I like UBUNTU because it&#8217;s free and fast and universally supported. Finally, I like Windows because they have great support and fast time-to-market and it&#8217;s easy to write programs for it with .NET.</p>
<p>As I am both a Windows software developer (on Windows) and a professional photographer/creative designer (on Mac) I have both systems. I only Develop (write software applications and do database administration) on Windows and I only do photos on my Mac. I&#8217;m hoping to do programming on Mac, but have to learn more about it.</p>
<p>My solution to this discussion about Picasa on the Mac is to buy <a href="http://www.adobe.com/lightroom" target="_blank">Lightroom</a> from Adobe. What&#8217;s super-nice about it is that it takes only one license to use it on both Mac and Windows. If I have to do a few things like cataloging and photo work on Windows I can, then transfer it to the Mac.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also super-nice because if someone migrates from Windows to Mac, you have a Catalog (database) that functions on both machines. Just copy it over and run it in Lightroom for Mac.</p>
<p>The Lightroom engine is written to work with the same database structures on either machine, which are Operating System agnostic (meaning it doesn&#8217;t care what machine the database is on).</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been my answer. My wife loves Picasa and we run Ubuntu at home! I like it too! But I love the richer features of <strong>Lightroom</strong>. I like the simplicity of Picasa. But at the expense of being able to work on both of my machines daily, and have a professional workflow system. I had to buy <strong>Lightroom</strong>! Sorry to bust up the FREE stuff like this and suggest something that doesn&#8217;t help the free community. But this is what I had to do.</p>
<p>If it grabs the attention of Google to get &#8220;the party started&#8221; and get moving on it to rollout faster, then so be it.</p>
<p>Some additional notes: I&#8217;m trying to get my wife on Lightroom. But we run Ubuntu on our family computer, on an AMD-64 PC. Picasa runs great there too. We love it. We just had our own conversation recently that I need to upgrade our family computer and I would like to make it a Mac.</p>
<p>She said &#8220;As soon as Picasa comes to the Mac it would be a great move.&#8221; =)</p>
<p>So &#8230; the battle right now is &#8220;to teach her Lightroom&#8221;, or wait for &#8220;Picasa on the Mac&#8221;. She&#8217;s leaning towards &#8220;Picasa on the Mac&#8221;. That sounds great for me &#8217;cause I&#8217;d love to get them Macs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.snapjag.com/2008/09/mac-vs-picasa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
	<price></price>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

